Sexism

 The negative community thoughts of women having a lower zeal of working in the technology sector have profiled them as being only fit for society, and humanity works. The professional of science in the IT and medicine sectors mainly composed of the male gender. The male chauvinism in the society significantly contributes to the disparity of women taking science roles and duties. The different cultures, especially in the olden days, undermined the girl child education. Girl child education represented few concerns in the society, especially in the African context. The lagging of women behind started long time that affected the mindset of achievements in the world today. A country like in the US, you will find a large number of the university degrees attained by the women yet in the employment sector of the STEM a quarter of them are employed. A study conducted in the year 2009 indicated 57 percent of the university degrees are of the feminine gender while 43 percent for the male. Checking on total employment 48 percent women and 52 male. The situation worsens in the science profession where 24 percent are female and 76 percent men. The disparity in employment brings the issue of social attitudes in reinforcing the agenda of more women sensitization and encouragement programs of taking science subjects and job.
Share of scientists and others stereotypes in the mass media and internet


The mass media and the internet play a vital role in the promotion of professionals’ employment in the various sectors of the economy. The media gives information concerning application standards required in a particular profession and is easy for a person to match the levels if the information is availed early. It is important for the print media and Television stations to use Men and Women in equal measure during advertisement of careers as this will encourage both genders in seeking science employment. Creation of positive environment of women achieving the best in the STEM work will support the others in becoming scientists. The internet has lots of information on the various education and jobs to seek. Women must take the roles of research in the science department by finding the aid of the internet information. Confidence building in girls is critical for the shunning away stereotypes in the education and employment sector.
Importance of perceptions of professionals in their jobs


The creation of an image in the mind of a person affects how he/she grows up. The society thought of women not capable of handling math and science affects the morale of them taking the subjects. The stereotyping of women weak in the STEM education by the men discourages the females in taking science education thus becoming few in the science industry of employment. Emphasis should be inculcated in the society to have equal opportunities for the male and female gender in the education sector and professional areas.
Effective of the sources in the representation


The FEMinc resources of the media shaping of women perception in the community contribute vital information that changes society outlook and approach concerning female education in science and technology. The research shows the key role the media play in educating the many people of the society in changing their negative thoughts of women education in the science sector. The Journal of Michigan University of the representation of women in the theory of Big Bang shows the importance of using the women who achieved success in the scantiest section to encourage others in taking roles of scientific research


The two types of research aids in the ejection of the social mind concerning the women having the knowledge and skills in the STEM employment sector. The support of women to achieve better forms the basis of the change process. The media plays an important role in displaying active content that encourages feminine gender of greater performance. The involvement of women in research brings their input in the scientific matters.
Jack Hill
The Big Bang Theory. Perf. Johnny Galecki, Jim Parsons, and Kaley Cuoco. Warner Bros, 2007–2013. DVD. Boyce, Tammy. “Journalism and Expertise.” Journalism Studies 7.6 (2006): 889–906.Print.
Brasfield, Rebecca. “Rereading Sex and theCity: Exposing Hegemonic Feminist Narrative.” Journal of Popular Film and Tele-vision 34.3 (2006): 130–39. Print.
Crotty, Mark. “Murphy Would ProbablyAlso Win the Election—The Effect of Television as Related to the Portrayal ofthe Family in Situation Comedies.” Journal of Popular Culture 29.3 (1995): 1–15.Print.
Dow, Bonnie J. “Femininity and Feminismin Murphy Brown.” Southern Communication Journal 57.2 (1992): 143–55. Print.———. “Hegemony, Feminist Criticism,and The Mary Tyler Moore Show.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7（1990): 261–74. Print.
Dubrofsky, Rachel. “Ally McBeal as Post-feminist Icon: The Aestheticizing and Fetishizing of the Independent Working Woman.” The Communication Review 5(2002): 265–84. Print.
Dudo, Anthony, Dominique Brossard, James Shanahan, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. “Science on Television in the 21st Century: Recent Trends in Portrayals and Their Contributions to Public Attitudes toward Science.”Communication Research 38.6 (2011):754–77. Print.
Edwards, Leigh H. “Dangerous Minds: The Woman Professor on Television.” Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture., Ed. Sherri A. Inness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 121–36. Print.
Flicker, Eva. “Between Brains and Breasts Women Scientists in Fiction Film: On the Marginalization and Sexualization of Scientific Competence.” Public Understand-ing of Science 12 (2003): 307–18. Print.
Gerber, George. “Scientists on the TV Screen.” Society 18.4 (1981): 41–44. Print.Gitlin, Todd. “Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment.” Social Problems 26.3 (1979):251–66. Print.
Hammers, Michele L. “Cautionary Tales of Liberation and Female Professionalism:The Case against Ally McBeal.” Western Journal of Communication 69.2 (2005):167–82. Print.
Hofstadter, Richard. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. 1964. New York: Random House, 2012. Print.
Holderman, Lisa B. “Media-ConstructedAnti-Intellectualism: The Portrayal of Experts in Popular US Television Talk Shows.” New Jersey Journal of Communication 11.1 (2003): 45–62. Print.
Inness, Sherri A. “Introduction: Who Remembers Sabrina? Intelligence, Gender,and the Media.” Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture. Ed. Sherri A. Inness.New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.1–10. Print.
Limoges, Camille. “Expert Knowledge and Decision-Making in Controversy Contexts.” Public Understanding of Science 2(1993): 417–26. Print.
Long, Marilee, Jocelyn Steinke, Brooks Applegate, Maria Knight Lapinksi, MarneJ. Johnson, and Sayani Ghosh. “Male and Female Scientists in Television Programs Popular among Middle School-Age Children.” Science Communication 32.3(2010): 356–82. Print.
Lotz, Amanda D. “Institutional Causes ofDisparity among Black and White Comedy Images and Audiences.” The SitcomReader: Viewed and Skewed. Ed. Mary M. Dalton and Laura R. Linder. New York:SUNY, 2005. 139–50. Print. Mittell, Jason. Television and American Culture. New York: Oxford UP, 2010.Print.
Mock, Erin Lee. “The Horror of ‘Honey,I’m Home!’: The Perils of Postwar Family Love in the Domestic Sitcom.” Film &History 41.2 (2011): 29–50. Print.
Ouellette, Laurie. “Victims No More: Post- feminism, Television, and Ally McBeal.” The Communication Review 5 (2002):315–35. Print.
Pollack, Eileen. “Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?” The New York Times 3 Oct. 2010. Web. <http://www.
nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.
html?_r=0>.
Steinke, Jocelyn. “Cultural Representations of Gender and Science : Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popu-
lar Films.” Science Communication 27.1 (2005): 27–63. Print.
Steinke, Jocelyn, Brooks Applegate, Maria Lapinski, Lisa Ryan, and Marilee Long. “Gender Differences in Adolescents’
Wishful Identification with Scientists Characters on Television.” Science Communication 34.2 (2012): 163–99. Print.